  |  
      |  
    
        
      Betz'
      Law
        The
      Ideal Braking of the Wind 
      The more kinetic energy a wind turbine pulls out of
      the wind, the more the wind will be slowed down as it leaves
      the left side of the turbine in the picture. (If you wonder about
      the stream tube in the picture, you have not read the page on
      how the wind turbine deflects the wind). 
       If we tried to extract all the energy from
      the wind, the air would move away with the speed zero, i.e. the
      air could not leave the turbine. In that case we would not extract
      any energy at all, since all of the air would obviously also
      be prevented from entering the rotor of the turbine. 
       In the other extreme case, the wind could
      pass though our tube above without being hindered at all. In
      this case we would likewise not have extracted any energy from
      the wind. 
       We can therefore assume that there must be
      some way of braking the wind which is in between these two extremes,
      and is more efficient in converting the energy in the wind to
      useful mechanical energy. It turns out that there is a surprisingly
      simple answer to this: An ideal wind turbine would slow down
      the wind by 2/3 of its original speed. To understand why,
      we have to use the fundamental physical law for the aerodynamics
      of wind turbines: 
      Betz'
      Law 
        Betz' law says that you
      can only convert less than 16/27 (or 59%) of the kinetic energy
      in the wind to mechanical energy using a wind turbine. 
       Betz' law was first formulated by the German
      Physicist Albert Betz in 1919. His book "Wind-Energie"
      published in 1926 gives a good account of the knowledge of wind
      energy and wind turbines at that moment. 
       It is quite surprising that one can make
      such a sweeping, general statement which applies to any wind
      turbine with a disc-like rotor. 
       To prove the theorem requires a bit of math
      and physics, but don't be put off by that, as Betz himself writes
      in his book. Betz' own proof
      of the theorem is included in the Reference
      Manual on this web site.
      |