
EWEA
Opinion:
A
Future EU Directive on Access of Electricity from Renewable Energy
Sources to the Internal Market in Electricity
Summary
Objective
The European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) fully
supports the strategic aim of the European Commission to double
the share of renewable energy in the energy mix of the Union
from the present 6% to 12% by 2010.
Purchasing
Obligation
EWEA believes that a binding obligation should be
placed on electricity suppliers to purchase an agreed minimum
share of renewable generation as an appropriate mechanism within
a fully liberalised electricity market. The purchasing obligation
should be set at a minimum of 8% of average annual electricity
consumption by 2005, and at least 4 percentage points more than
the share of electricity from renewable energy sources in 1996.
Power
Purchasing Agreements
The wind industry requires long term power purchasing
contracts at a price which is determined at the outset and fully
recognising the real value and the positive effects of renewable
energies. EWEA is concerned that this is not sufficiently taken
into account in the current draft proposal for a Directive.
Liberalised
Electricity Market
It will take some time before the Electricity market
is fully liberalised. Furthermore, the Directive should take
into account that the rate of liberalisation for the renewables
sector can only be in step with the liberalisation of the conventional
electricity industry. This sector is currently distorted and
unbalanced to the disadvantage of renewables.
Member
States
Until the market is fully liberalised, an obligation
should be placed upon individual member states to introduce or
maintain where they already exist appropriate market support
mechanisms which best suit their individual circumstances.
National
Renewable Energy Regulator
A renewable energy regulator should be appointed in
each member state to ensure that the requirements of all aspects
of the Directive including planning, grid connections and market
mechanisms are properly implemented. The implementation of the
programmes by member states should be reviewed periodically.
Competition
EWEA recognises that the competitiveness of renewables
will be improved through competition within each technology.
Competition should not be introduced between different renewable
technologies until they are fully mature and competitive in the
market.
Electricity
Grid
Grid operators should extend and reinforce the grid
to the areas where electricity from renewables can be produced,
just as they are obliged to modify, extend and reinforce the
grid to meet the electricity demand.
Flexibility
The application of the Directive must be flexible.
Should the Directive be too ambitious in demanding long-term
market reforms, it is likely that this could destroy present
renewable energy markets.
----------------
Preamble
The European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) fully
supports the strategic aim of the European Commission set out
in the White Paper on renewable energy. In the White Paper the
Commission proposed to double the share of renewable energy in
the energy mix of the Union from the present 6% to 12% by 2010.
This
policy is essential in order to meet the Union's commitments
in its environmental and energy policies, both internally and
in relation to its external obligations undertaken in Rio, Kyoto,
and Buenos Aires.
Electricity
generation is one of the major contributors to emissions of CO2,
SOX and NOX. Therefore, electricity savings
and increased generation using renewables are necessary to ensure
the success of this policy.
EWEA
believes that in order for the European target of 12% of overall
energy supply to be met by renewables by 2010, each member country
should be obliged to produce an increasing share of its electricity
or energy supply from renewable sources.
In
order to realise the Commission's target for renewable energies
of 12 % by 2010 against the background of countries moving towards
full liberalisation of their electricity industries at differing
paces over the period, and 40.000 MW installed wind capacity,
the White Paper on Renewable Energies has already presented ideas
of how to ensure "fair access for renewables to the electricity
market". Chapter 2.2.1 suggests the introduction of guidelines
on the minimum price to be paid to a generator from renewable
energy sources.
The
minimum price may be determined either by national/local governments
or by competition, and must be sufficient to enable projects
to earn a reasonable rate of return.
The
wind industry requires long term power purchasing contracts at
a price which is determined at the outset and fully recognising
the real value and the positive effects of renewable energies.
However, EWEA is concerned that the current draft proposal for
a Directive does not take this into account sufficiently.
Even
if the costs for wind generated electricity have declined very
significantly during the 1990s, new renewables are generally
not yet competitive with conventional electricity generating
technologies without taking the environmental benefits of renewables
into account. However, to decrease costs, it is essential to
ensure volume production and a long-term learning curve experience
for the industry.
In
each member state, a renewables regulator should be appointed
to ensure that the requirements of all aspects of the Directive
including planning, grid connections and market mechanisms are
properly implemented.
1
Renewables Purchasing Obligation
The EWEA welcomes the proposal for a binding obligation
to be placed on electricity suppliers to purchase an agreed minimum
share of renewable generation as an appropriate mechanism within
a fully liberalised electricity market. It is clear, however,
that it will be some time before a fully liberalised market has
been achieved in all countries of the EU. Until such a market
is in place, the obligation should be placed upon individual
member states using mechanisms which suit their individual circumstances.
In
EWEA's view the purchasing obligation should be set at a minimum
of 8% of average annual electricity consumption by 2005, and
at least 4 percentage points more than the share of electricity
from renewable energy sources in 1996.
It
is clear that autoproducers would have to be included in any
purchasing obligation upon electricity suppliers, since otherwise
they would have the ability to opt out of the support system,
leaving the remaining electricity consumers to bear the cost
burden alone.
As
defined in the preamble EWEA believes that a binding percentage
obligation would not work successfully unless a minimum price
level is established. Such arrangements are fully in line with
article 130r (2) of the EU Treaty, as well as with the Directive
for an Internal Electricity Market.
Furthermore,
the Directive should take into account that the rate of liberalisation
for the renewables sector can only be in step with the liberalisation
of the conventional electricity industry. This sector is currently
distorted and unbalanced to the disadvantage of renewables.
1.1
Review Mechanism
EWEA believes it is important that the progress in
filling the binding targets by member states be reviewed periodically,
and that member states submit renewables programmes which demonstrably
are able to achieve the targets set by the Union.
2
Renewables Support Systems
2.1
The Need for Workable Support Mechanisms
In order to achieve the target, each member state should introduce
or maintain where they already exist appropriate market support
mechanisms which suit their individual circumstances in the short
and medium term. Indeed, there is a need for flexibility in applying
the Directive. If the Directive is too ambitious in demanding
long-term market reform here and now, it is likely that present
renewable energy markets will be destroyed in the process.
2.2 Competition among
Renewable Producers vs. a Case for Subsidiarity
EWEA recognises the Commission's concern that the
competitiveness of renewables be improved through competition
between renewables producers within each technology, with a view
to ultimately creating an internal market for renewable energy.
Competition should not be introduced between different renewable
technologies until they are fully mature and competitive in the
market. This can only be effective across all member states once
fully liberalised electricity markets have been established.
Offshore wind energy should be considered a different technology
than onshore wind energy due to substantially different circumstances,
as stated in the White Paper. The Commission should note however
that there is already fierce competition between wind turbine
manufacturers and wind farm developers throughout Europe.
At
present, prices for renewables in general and wind in particular
vary widely between member states. Price variations are mainly,
but not exclusively a reflection of differences in resource base
(average wind speeds), varying population density, differing
accessibility of sites, and varying needs for grid reinforcement.
They also reflect very real differences in social priorities
regarding considerations of landscape architecture, e.g. a preference
for dispersed development, preferences for local community involvement
in ownership with a corresponding necessity of reducing risk
for small investors. Finally, the differences in prices reflect
differing levels of ambition as to the degree of wind penetration
in the grid.
A
system which solely seeks to minimise the cost of renewables
across the European Union as a whole would mean that wind energy
would only be concentrated in a few areas of the Union. This
would be unacceptable to the public. As we mention below, there
are other considerations than energy policy and market liberalisation
which play an important role in the shaping of national renewables
policies. These issues range from employment to planning considerations.
2.3 The Experience
with Competitive bidding Systems
Bidding systems such as the NFFO system operated in
the UK have been successful in reducing the cost of energy. This
has been partly due to the competitive element these systems
have introduced, but also due to increasing investor confidence
in wind energy technology and reduction in turbine prices, resulting
from increasing volumes of production in other markets around
the world.
Competition
to achieve minimum electricity prices has tended to concentrate
developments in high wind speed areas. This has in some cases
resulted in planning difficulties which has constrained the number
of projects reaching realisation. For bidding systems to be most
effective, they should be combined with a planning system which
requires local authorities to allocate zone for wind farm developments,
in order to avoid the concentration issue.
2.4 Guaranteed Price
Feed-in Schemes
The guaranteed feed in schemes are presently extremely
successful in bringing about a significant growth in wind generating
capacity in Germany, Denmark, and Spain (90% of the European
wind turbine manufacturing is located in these countries creating
many thousands jobs).
The
basic advantage of these schemes is the certainty it gives to
investors at the time they make their investment decisions. Another
advantage is that the schemes make it easier to avoid concentrated
wind park developments in a single area, and that they make individual
or co-operative ownership possible. This has both the advantage
of easing the social consensus necessary to obtain local planning
permission (discussed further below), and from a technical point
of view ensuring a better dispersion of generating capacity in
the grid (embedded generation).
Since
Germany, Denmark and Spain account for more than 80 per cent
of the total wind capacity installed in the EU, and for three
quarters of the World market for turbine installation in 1997,
it would be extremely hazardous to disallow these guaranteed
price feed-in schemes without reliable evidence that other support
systems would work as well.
2.5 Coexistence of
Different support Mechanisms
EWEA believes that with the present diversity of systems
within the Union, different support systems can coexist without
creating any noticeable distortion of competition, and that they
must be allowed to do so. In the event of a change of support
system in a member state in accordance with the Directive, any
bona-fide investors must be compensated for any reduction in
anticipated income at the time the project was first commissioned.
3. Certification
of Electricity from Renewable Energy Sources and Green Energy
Pricing
EWEA supports an official green energy labelling scheme
for the European Union. Green energy labelling would be a necessity
to ensure the operation of a mandatory renewables purchasing
requirement, in any case, and it would be useful to protect voluntary
green pricing schemes against fraud.
3.1 Green Pricing
Schemes
Although the EWEA believes that whilst voluntary green
pricing schemes will only bring a minor contribution to total
demand for new renewables, it is important to protect citizens
against fraud and manipulation in this context. It should therefore
be ensured that any voluntary purchases of renewables generated
electricity will be additional to the requirements set by the
Directive's mandatory purchasing requirements.
4 Types
of renewables to be Included in the Directive
The Commission should take note of the fact that electricity
from non-organic waste cannot be considered a sustainable energy
source. Instead, geothermal electricity should be included in
the Directive.
4.1 Need for Separate
Targets and for Differentiated Pricing for Different Renewable
Technologies
The Directive would have to provide separate minimum targets
for each technology. In that case, however, some periodical review
mechanism would be necessary in order to avoid unwarranted distortion
of competition between the technologies.
Different
renewable technologies are at different stages of commercial
development, e.g. offshore wind energy compared to onshore wind
energy, energy crops, etc. It is therefore necessary to establish
differentiated pricing mechanisms, and eventually, separate minimum
targets for different technologies. Otherwise only one or two
technologies will benefit from large-scale development.
5 Power
Purchasing Contracts
Wind energy is a different commodity from traditional
fossil fuel or nuclear generated electricity. Although total
energy output is fairly stable and predictable from year to year,
the resource is not dispatchable, a fact which is recognised
by the Electricity Directive which gives priority access to the
grid for wind and other renewables. The technology may be dispersed
in the grid thus giving the additional advantage of lower grid
losses.
Since
ownership tends to be very dispersed among independent power
producers, their marketing muscle and consequently their ability
to forge standard contracts for this commodity may be assumed
to be very limited. Therefore, there is a strong case for public
regulation of electricity contract terms for wind energy and
other renewables. This is even more true since the technology
is very sensitive to capital costs, and has no possibility of
adjusting output in accordance with current prices on the market,
once a turbine has been installed.
In
EWEA's view, a Commission proposal for a Directive must not exclude
the use of market stabilisation mechanisms to ensure stable and
predictable electricity prices which reflect the value of environmental
benefits, and the benefits of distributed generation, cf. a base
price plus an environmental bonus as mentioned in the Commission's
White Paper on renewables.
The
wind industry needs long term power purchasing contracts at a
price which is determined at the outset. All contracts entered
into should have a minimum term to ensure that finance for the
projects can be obtained and that investors' interests can be
protected.
6 Need
for Streamlined Planning Procedures
Wind energy conversion is a resource-based industry,
which relies heavily on the local microclimate. The best wind
resources in member states tend to be concentrated in comparatively
remote regional development areas. Although the size of the resource
base per se is not a constraint on industry expansion in Europe,
landscape architecture and public planning considerations are
important constraints on development.
Successful
large-scale deployment of wind energy requires streamlined and
positive procedures for authorisation. The Danish model which
has subsequently been taken up in Germany in a modified form
has been quite successful: National, regional, and local planning
has been co-ordinated to create development plans for sites suitable
for wind turbine installation. This has enabled wind turbine
installations to proceed with a fast-track planning procedure.
EWEA
recommends such a procedure, including a "single counter"
for filing applications and for co-ordinating public authorities'
processing of applications.
6.1 The Importance
of Social Consensus - linked to Financing Mechanisms
One of the important elements in gaining public and
political acceptance for siting wind turbines is local influence
through local planning and local ownership, such as has been
the case in the Danish and German wind co-operatives. Likewise,
wind energy development has brought prosperity to farmers and
an increased tax base in remote municipalities in member states,
thus assisting regional development. The wind industry and the
national wind turbine owners' associations believe that these
elements are important to ensure the success of large-scale implementation
of wind energy in dispersed locations throughout the Union.
It
is therefore important to ensure that the future financing mechanisms
for wind energy encourage local participation in ownership.
6.2 Employment Considerations:
Critical Mass per Geographical Market
Employment plays an important role for the public
and political acceptance of renewables. For some renewables,
like wind energy, the vast majority of expenditures are incurred
up front at the moment of investment, whereas operating costs
are extremely low. This means that an aggressive investment policy
for renewables will bring immediate employment benefits in regions
where wind turbines are manufactured or installed.
7 Grid
System Issues
The present electricity grid in member states was
built and optimised to accommodate large fossil fuel fired or
nuclear power plant. It is highly centralised, often located
near cities of industrial centres. The best wind resources, however,
are generally located in areas that are unattractive for city
or industrial development. These areas are therefore generally
equipped with a weak electrical grid, and planning constraints
often prevent wind turbine operators to optimise the size and
location of their installations. The excess costs are thus to
a large extent the result of public planning preferences.
The
future European sustainable electricity grid will have to be
much more geared towards smaller and more dispersed generating
units located where the renewable resource is to be found. Just
as grid companies are obliged to modify, extend and reinforce
their grid to meet electricity demand, they should be obliged
to extend and reinforce the grid to the areas which can provide
a sustainable, safe, clean, and socially acceptable energy supply.
It should therefore be an obligation for the transmission and
distribution system operators to provide the necessary grid to
the suitable areas.
Such
a system operates in Denmark, where grid companies are obliged
to provide a grid connection point for any publicly planned wind
turbine development area of at least 1.5 MW rated power capacity.
The
large scale development of wind power requires using new areas
with weak electrical grids. The first project in a new area cannot
be expected to carry the grid reinforcement costs because this
will make the project uneconomic and thus act as a bar to development.
It should therefore be an obligation for the transmission and
distribution system operators to provide the necessary grid to
the suitable areas, the cost of which should be passed onto consumers
or publicly funded.
|